Richard Wilde
Richard Wilde (born 1948) became actively involved with Bradwell Windmill as a volunteer in the years following its 2014 restoration, although he had observed earlier work by the Milton Keynes Development Corporation in the 1970s. He explains that the Corporation restored the mill primarily as a visitor attraction to demonstrate that Milton Keynes had history, though it was not made fully operational at that time.
A key development in the later restoration was the installation of an electric motor, allowing milling independent of wind. Today, flour is produced mainly during summer weekends and heritage events. Because the mill is not licensed to sell flour commercially, it is given away in exchange for donations. Richard sees licensing — requiring a clean room, hygiene compliance and digital weighing equipment — as essential for long-term financial sustainability. Without some income stream, he argues, the mill risks becoming a “money pit.”
He emphasises that the sails currently in place are not original. While they do turn, their sweep partially covers the main entrance, meaning visitors cannot safely enter when the mill is wind-driven. The electric motor allows safe demonstrations inside. Grain is purchased organically from Hertfordshire at around £48 per 25kg bag, costing £500–£600 annually in recent years.
Richard highlights ongoing tensions with the current council regarding communication, budgeting and restoration plans. Volunteers have submitted detailed knowledge of required repairs — including cap maintenance, sail coatings and structural issues — but feel excluded from decision-making. He is concerned that insufficient funding and a lack of practical understanding could repeat past mistakes, particularly regarding materials and heritage requirements.
Maintenance, he notes, is cyclical: sails and caps require repainting every five to seven years at a cost of several thousand pounds. Skilled millwrights are scarce in the UK — perhaps fewer than ten — making specialist work expensive and difficult to schedule.
Built around 1806 and operational until approximately 1876, the mill had a relatively short commercial life. Its decline coincided with the expansion of industrial milling, cheaper imported grain and railway distribution. Much original structure survived because it was never converted to steam power, though machinery and millstones were auctioned off after closure.
Richard believes the mill’s long-term future depends on partnership with the local museum, sustained volunteer support and a realistic maintenance plan. Without active management and financial sustainability, even restored heritage risks gradual decline.




No Comments
Add a comment about this page